loracs: (yakity yak)
A man steals another man's identity to get access to health care and a heart operation.  There is clearly a crime and a victim, but after you scrape away the legal aspects, I believe we are still left with another crime and another victim.  It should be a crime in this country that anyone has to go to this length to receive life saving medical help.  As despicable a character as the thief is (ex-con who threatened to blown up his victim's house if he told anyone) and as helpless as the victim seemed (mentally disabled man), never-the-less I still want a second conviction.  This country's health care delivery system is a co-conspirator in this crime.  WE THE PEOPLE elected the officials who put and keep this broken system in place, so we all share a percentage of guilt.    

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1118995,4_1_JO21_HEART_S1.article 
loracs: (devil dobie)
[personal profile] stonebenderand I attended this event (http://californiaspeaks.org/).  It was fun, tiring and strange.  And what's the odds that we would go to a forum of 800 people, picked randomly from the entire Bay Area and meet 5 people we knew?  And to add to the fun, arriving late and seated right next to me a person (L), who we've known for years and years and he has no editor between what he things and what he says.  Plus, he manages to,say with one hand "oh, no I'm okay" and with the other "help me, this isn't right, fix it".  The pattern of wave one hand, wave the other and then both ,often distracted me from the conversation at the table.

Did I say we were at tables of 10 people, including one facilitator,  There was video and live feeds from the other sites, as we all went through a series of health care insurance issues.  Our table was very cool.  Everyone wanted single payer.  Even though it was stated quite plainly that the Single Payer bill, now working its way through the California political system, did not have a chance because the Governor said he would Veto it if it came to his desk.  Did we let that stop us?  Nope.  Each table had a computer to connect every site together.  We expressed our "likes, dislikes, and concerns" for each issue in this manner.  On every issue we made reference to why that particular issue would be better under a single payer system.  And we weren't the only ones, in the room or around the state, because towards the end they put in a vote on the Single Payer option.  In addition to a computer at each table, everyone had a keypad to vote on the issues.  They tried really hard to keep insurance companies in the mix, but it was pretty obvious that there is a lot of energy for really changing the system.  We'll see what, if anything, comes of it.  Was this real democracy at work or a PR event/collection of statistical data to serve their predetermined purpose.  I really hope it was the first, because the second will piss me off and depress me - not my favorite combo of emotions.

Profile

loracs: (Default)
loracs

February 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213 1415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2017 06:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios