Not sure about these hospitalists.
Jul. 31st, 2007 05:18 pmA hospitalists is a doctor whose primary professional focus is hospital medicine. Starting in the mid-90’s, these doctors have taken over most aspects of a persons care while in the hospital. As I understand it, this has come about for a couple of reasons. First, primary care providers find it less cost effective to see their patients in the hospital. They can make more in the office. Second, the number of hours interns and residents can work in a week have been restricted in the last decade. These people have provided much of the hospital patient’s care previously. Therefore, we have the development of this new specialty. In effect, “permanent residents” making the rounds everyday, making all kinds of decisions without having every laid eyes or hands on the person before. And if you are in the hospital more than a few days, as
stonebenderhas been, then you may see 3 or 4 different hospitalists, each one reading your chart, talking to you for a few minutes and pronouncing you better, worst or the same and by the way, take this new pill/bag o'drugs.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It may not be quite that cavalier, but it feels like it. I want the same person to hear his lungs from day to day and then tell me how he’s progressing. Reading a chart (I hope), listening to his lungs and then saying – “they sound better” does not leave me with a great deal of confidence. “Better than what?” I want to know.
I know he’s getting better. I see it day by day, even thought it has been slow going. What if I didn’t see an improvement? Would the hospitalists know what’s going on? In addition, if she or he is seeing a hundred patients a day, let’s say; how do I know they really have the time to grok his body, his anxiety, his needs, and his health? As serious as pneumonia is, what would I do if it were something more deadly?
Yeah, I’m just not sure I like this new turn of events in health care.